Model S
about 88%after 200,000 miles. Tesla Impact Report 2023 (Model S and X together).
Geotab’s study of 22,700+ EVs finds 81.6% of capacity left after 8 years. Tesla’s own figures put Model S and Model X at 88%, and Model 3 and Model Y at 85%, after 200,000 miles. Here is what the studies say, model by model, and what pushes a battery up or down that range.
By mileage: published figures
| Model | At 93,205 miles | At 200,000 miles | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model S | no figure | 88% | Tesla 2023 Impact Report, S and X together |
| Model X | no figure | 88% | Tesla 2023 Impact Report, S and X together |
| Model 3 | 88.9% | 85% | AVILOO 2026 (all variants); Tesla 2023 (Long Range) |
| Model Y | 90.3% | 85% | AVILOO 2026 (all variants); Tesla 2023 (Long Range) |
By age: Geotab’s straight-line projection
| Age | All EVs, average | Little fast-charging | Heavy fast-charging |
|---|---|---|---|
| New | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 years | 95.4% | 97% | 94% |
| 4 years | 90.8% | 94% | 88% |
| 6 years | 86.2% | 91% | 82% |
| 8 years | 81.6% | 88% | 76% |
The columns are Geotab’s straight-line projection (2.3, 1.5 and 3 percent a year) for fleets of mixed makes, not measurements at each age. At 8 years they are the study’s own figures: 81.6%, 88% and 76%.
Published headline figure first, and this site’s own median second when enough cars share a group. Model S, Model X, Model 3 and Model Y.
about 88%after 200,000 miles. Tesla Impact Report 2023 (Model S and X together).
about 88%after 200,000 miles. Tesla Impact Report 2023 (Model S and X together).
about 85%after 200,000 miles. Tesla Impact Report 2023, Long Range. 88.9% at 93,205 miles in AVILOO’s 2026 tests.
about 85%after 200,000 miles. Tesla Impact Report 2023, Long Range. 90.3% at 93,205 miles in AVILOO’s 2026 tests.
Battery degradation is the slow loss of the energy a pack can store. A car that held 75 kWh when new and holds 69 kWh later has 92% of its capacity left. It shows up as less range on a full charge, not as a car that suddenly stops working.
Capacity is measured as a share of the original, so models with big and small packs can be compared. The same percentage means a different number of kilowatt-hours for each pack.
Lithium-ion packs tend to lose the most in the first two to three years and then settle into a slower decline. Recurrent’s analysis of about 14,000 Teslas showed the steep first stretch in rated range, and the studies behind the chart agree on the pattern even where they disagree on the exact figure (Recurrent, 2024).
This is why a straight line through two points can mislead. Geotab’s 81.6% after eight years is a projection of a steady yearly loss; a three-year-old car can be well ahead of that line and still follow the same long-term curve. The charts on this page mark where a line is drawn through published points and where it is measured. The longer guide Tesla battery degradation: how packs lose capacity explains the curve.
Frequent high-power charging is the largest single stressor in Geotab’s data: 3% a year for cars that fast-charge above 100 kW in more than 40% of sessions, against 1.5% a year for cars that rarely do, a gap of 1.5 points a year (Geotab, 2026).
AVILOO’s 2023 study of about 160 EVs measured roughly 7.5 points lower battery health at 80,000 to 100,000 km, and about 17 points lower at 180,000 to 200,000 km, for cars that charged on fast chargers all the time (AVILOO, 2023). Occasional road-trip use is not that pattern.
Cars in hot climates (more than 35% of days above 25 degrees C) lost about 0.4 points a year more than the rest in the same Geotab study.
Nickel-based packs (NCA and NMC) hold more energy per kilogram. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) packs are heavier for the same energy. In 9,954 Swedish tests of used Model 3 cars above 62,000 miles, the CATL LFP pack averaged 93.3%; the nickel packs averaged 88.2% to 91.5% (Carla with AVILOO diagnostics, 2026).
The same car can come with different cells over its life. In the same Swedish data the smallest Panasonic pack (52.4 kWh) scored lowest. Pack size, supplier and chemistry change together there, so the study cannot separate them.
2026 (data to 2025)
22,700+ EVs, 21 models, fleets in Canada, the U.S. and Europe. Average degradation 2.3% a year, 81.6% capacity left after 8 years. Fast-charging above 100 kW in more than 40% of sessions: 3.0% a year (76% after 8 years); little DC fast charging: 1.5% a year (88% after 8 years). Hot climates (more than 35% of days above 25 C): 0.4 points a year faster. Opened and read directly. Geotab projects a straight line; it is a fleet average for all makes, not Tesla only.
https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-health/2024
After about 200,000 miles (322,000 km): Model S and Model X keep 88% of original capacity on average; Model 3 and Model Y Long Range (2170 cells) keep 85%, and about 68% of that fleet stays above 80%. Not covering Standard Range or 4680-cell cars. Tesla’s own PDF returned an access error when we tried it, so the figures were read through ArenaEV and Not a Tesla App (second link).
https://www.arenaev.com/teslas_electric_cars_are_built_to_last_according_to_battery_degradation_data-news-3651.phphttps://www.notateslaapp.com/news/2038/impact-report-tesla-vehicles-8x-less-likely-to-catch-fire-and-batteries-degrade-15-after-200k-miles2026
9,954 battery tests on used cars, 2022 to 2026, a Swedish used-EV retailer. Model 3 cars above 62,000 miles (100,000 km), battery health by pack: CATL LFP 93.3%, LG nickel (NMC) 91.5%, Panasonic 77.8 kWh NCA 89.8%, Panasonic 52.4 kWh NCA 88.2%.
https://electrek.co/2026/07/15/tesla-lfp-battery-outlasts-nickel-model-3/2026
500,000+ tests, 20 models, 2022 to 2026. At 93,205 miles (150,000 km): Model Y 90.3%, Model 3 88.9%. The best and worst examples of the same car can differ by as much as 13.5 points. Ages of the cars were not stated.
https://www.carscoops.com/2026/09/battery-ev-degradation-study/2023
About 160 EVs of several makes. Compared with cars that did not fast-charge, battery health was about 7.5 points lower at 80,000 to 100,000 km and about 17 points lower at 180,000 to 200,000 km for cars that fast-charged all the time. Small sample, several makes.
https://aviloo.com/en/blog/first-measurement-of-battery-degradation-as-a-function-of-the-fast-charging-rate2024
About 14,000 Teslas, 1.6 million observations: Model 3 and Model Y showed about 64% of EPA rated range after roughly three years, but new cars start at only 70 to 72% of EPA range in this data, so this is range, not battery capacity. Used here only for the shape of the curve (steeper at first, flatter later).
https://www.carscoops.com/2024/05/tesla-batteries-only-deliver-64-of-epa-range-after-three-years-but-theres-a-big-asterisk-to-this-story/Battery Figures is independent and not affiliated with Tesla, Geotab, AVILOO, Recurrent or Carla. The studies above are theirs; we only quote them and say where.
Illustration lines. Lines through published points (Tesla at 200,000 miles, AVILOO at 93,205 miles) are drawn with a smooth curve between the points. Only the ringed dots are published numbers; the line between them is our drawing. Where only one point exists, the line is straight. Mileage figures are for different cars and different tests and are not a single study.
From cars on this site. Cars are grouped by age (six-month bands) and model, and each car counts once. A band shows a median when at least 3 cars are in it, the middle half when at least 5, and a trend when at least 8. Smaller groups are not shown. Capacity is usable kWh as a share of the model’s published figure. The page never carries a VIN, a mileage or a single car. The readings are Tesla’s own estimate and can be rounded or out of date.
Not an inspection. Averages describe groups. A single car can sit well above or below them.